ODF wins court dispute with Polish MFA once again

ODF wins court dispute with Polish MFA once again

In the dispute with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs since August 2017, the Open Dialog Foundation once again defended its position: the Regional Court for the capital city of Warsaw decided to dismiss the Minister of Foreign Affairs's complaint against the previous decision of the court of 7 December 2017 on the refusal to establish a board of trustees (and thus replacing the current Management Board) in our organisation.

Therefore, the attempts of Minister Witold Waszczykowski, and then his successor Jacek Czaputowicz, for ODF hostile takeover failed.In its extensive justification, the court almost completely shared the stance of the Foundation, formulated many times earlier, also in the correspondence with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs:

- The disputed publication on Facebook from July 2017 (May the state stop: let's shut down the government!) was Bartosz Kramek’s private text, not the official statement of the Foundation since it was published on his private profile;
- Bartosz Kramek has never been a member of the ODF Management Board (according to the Act on Foundations, on the basis of which the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was operating, the action of the Foundation's Management Board would have to violate the provisions of law in a significant way);
- It is of no importance that Bartosz acts as the Head of the Foundation Board and its proxy;The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, neither to us nor to our lawyers, was able to indicate exactly which legal norms were, in their opinion, violated (which was stressed several times in the court's justification);
- Even assuming that the sharing of Bartosz Kramek’s publication on the ODF profile was synonymous with the action (statement) of the Foundation's Management Board, it could not have been considered a serious violation of the law, because it is not a violation of law to consider the ideas and forms of social protests against government policy and politicians of the ruling party, and besides...
- The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, including the right to manifest one’s views, as well as the right to assembly and association (i.e., freedom of activity of non-governmental organisations).

The above decision may be appealed to a higher court; in this case, the District Court in Warsaw. Therefore this may not be the end, although, in the light of the decisions of the courts to date and arguments included in the justification, we may think that further actions in this area of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs would rather pose a significant risk of another public embarrassment for them.

In connection with last year's post of Bartosz Kramek and the Foundation's activity in defense of the rule of law in Poland, there are still a number of politically motivated proceedings, among others customs and tax control (Łódź Customs and Tax Office), as well as the investigation under art. 255 § 1 of the Criminal Code - provocation to commit a fiscal offense or crime (District Prosecutor's Office in Warsaw).

Among others, the delegates of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe [1], [2] and the international coalition of non-governmental organizations Civic Solidarity Platform have so far made their statement in the defense of critical non-governmental organizations and civic initiatives in Poland.A serious risk factor for us could be entrusting the case to the judge subordinate to the government via Random Assignment System - the recently implemented and controversial computer system which randomly (however, there are different and dangerous exceptions) assigns the signatures of cases to judges adjudicating in a given court department. Officially, the system aims at eliminating the human factor during assigning cases to judges that, in the opinion of the Minister of Justice, led to many misuses in the previous assignment system.  Fortunately, almost all the judges who have so far adjudicated in the cases of disobedient citizens and civic initiatives, are defending them. And it appears this is the case with our dispute as well.

Download the article in pdf, the original file of the Court's decision and the English translation from the attachments

For more detailed information, please contact:
Bartosz Kramek – bartosz.kramek@odfoundation.eu
The Open Dialog Foundation

Read our statements:

1. Open Dialog Foundation’s statement of 21 July 2017 on the dismantling of the rule of law in Poland
2. Open Dialog Foundation’s statement of 23 July 2017
3. The statement of the decision of the President of the Republic of Poland of 24 July 2017 regarding the judiciary reform
4. The Open Dialog Foundation’s statement of 31 July 2017 (funding and donors, or a few words about ‘soroses’)
5. Statement of the President of the Open Dialog Foundation Lyudmyla Kozlovska of 17.08.2017

See also:

- The litigation between the Open Dialog Foundation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs continues. Another summons to appear was received
- The court refused the MFA to suspend the Management Board of the Open Dialog Foundation
- MSZ will appoint a compulsory administrator for the Foundation? Bartosz Kramek: “We will be defending ourselves”
- Wirtualna Polska: the Open Dialog Foundation may be assigned a compulsory administrator“
- We see the Ministry’s call as censorship” – Bartosz Kramek comments on the Ministry’s letter
- Onet: The Government does not want an Open Dialog
- Seven inspectors representing the Customs and Tax Office in Łódź visited the Open Dialog Foundation
- Onet publishes a release about the tax and duty inspection at the ODF
- Wirtualna Polska about the media and government’s smear campaign against ODF. Kramek: “This is a politically motivated beginning of repressions”
- "We have not called for illegal actions" - Bartosz Kramek replies to MFA’s letter

Download All

Court decision_Open Dialog wins the case_original.pdf

pdf | 2 MB

Court decision_Open Dialog wins the case_EN.pdf

pdf | 1020 KB

Court decision_Open Dialog wins the case_RU.pdf

pdf | 314 KB

Court decision_Open Dialog wins the case_UA.pdf

pdf | 233 KB


pdf | 720 KB


pdf | 725 KB


pdf | 629 KB


pdf | 569 KB

[POLAND_ GAZETA.PL] The unprecedented movement of diplomats_ PiS's actions _harmonize with the goals of Russia._ Waszczykowski responds to the allegations. [7 May 2018].pdf

pdf | 146 KB

Related Stories
Europe, do not give up on Poland!

"Just as in 1980 there could not be freedom without solidarity, today there can not be freedom without the rule of law!" - former President Lech Wałęsa appeals to the European Commission regarding the reform of the Supreme Court in Poland, which will come into force on 3
Prominent Kazakhstani human rights defenders address Tajani and Mogherini

In the wake of new repressions and human rights violations, on May 22, 2018,  more than 200 people, including several civil activists, representatives of local NGOs and human rights defenders, have signed an appeal addressed to the President of the European Parliament, Mr Antonio Tajani, and the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission, Ms Federica Mogherini.
"We all pay for the cretinism of a good change" - Wojciech Maziarski on the court's decision in the matter of ODF

On May 24, Gazeta Wyborcza published a column entitled "Good change counted in ziobrys" on the application of the Minister of Foreign Affairs to the court to dismiss the board of the Open Dialog Foundation and the last similar case regarding the organization Citizens of the Republic of Poland.
Update on the persecution of the rule of law and attacks on civil society in Poland

1. The latest statement (31 May 2018) of the Conference of Ambassadors of the Republic of Poland: Violating the Principle of the Rule of Law Weakens Poland's Position in the World (Annex No. 6).2. The last report of the Citizens of the Republic of Poland (Obywatele RP) c
Check your inbox for a subscription confirmation email.
By confirming your subscription you will receive the latest content published on this website and consent to your information being securely processed and stored.